
Tuesday, 21 September 2021
Why Should You Establish a Trust for Estate Planning? 4 Reasons

Tuesday, 14 September 2021
Best Lawyers in Sydney React to Right to Silence Reforms

One of the fundamental rights of a person who is suspected of being involved in a certain crime is the right to silence. Popularly known to people as the right to remain silent, everyone has the right to stay silent or not answer questions asked by the police or any interviewer in an informal setting. The right also covers written statements, not just the verbal ones.
As simple as it is, a lot of suspects forget to practice this. This compromises their defence and places their winning chances at a high risk as the police or the complainant may use it against them during trials. Most of the time, the police may inform you that they just simply need your statement for recordkeeping purposes or that you now get a chance to tell your side of the story. In this situation, all you need to do is to simply inform them that you won’t be giving an interview or making any comment.
Many people in such situations fear that if they don’t give a statement, people may perceive them as already “guilty” of the case. This is not true and this is where the importance of seeking advice from an experienced lawyer Sydney comes in. Practising your right to silence only shows that it is the prosecution’s burden to find evidence to prove the accusations. It also shows that suspects have the right to not participate in any forced interrogations for criminal cases.
Right to Silence Exception
Refusal or declining police interviews is a right. This is the tricky part. It is a common practice for the police to attempt to interview a crime suspect, but they need to inform the suspect of their right to silence and be sure that this message is understood. The only exception for this is when the questions are about one’s name, birth date and address. It is a must that these questions are answered.
Formalisation of the Right
The New South Wales Evidence Act 1995 formalises a person’s right to silence. As stated in section 89 of the legislation, the prosecution or the court may not draw an adverse inference based on the fact that a suspect practice this right unless a prior special warning was given that staying silent will compromise his or her defence, especially in serious indictable cases.
Reactions of the Best Lawyers in Sydney to Reforms
This basic right is abused by some people, which triggered the NSW Parliament to introduce various criminal law reforms to speed up trials and make them more efficient. Among the reforms introduced are the mandatory statement of an alibi and the mental status of the suspect.
Many lawyer Sydney and the best law firms in Sydney have varying opinions about these reforms. Some of the best lawyers in Sydney criticised the lack of legal help provided to defendants, resulting from the stagnant legal aid budget set by the government
Other lawyer Sydney mentioned that the reforms lessen the power of this human right during police encounters or interviews. Some of the best law firms in Sydney raised such an argument with the basis that the special warning and staying silent will affect a suspect’s defence in court.
As a response to the points raised by the best lawyers in Sydney and the best law firms in Sydney, the government focused on the argument that the adverse inference is important to eliminate what it calls a wall of silence. However, top-notch lawyers in the city are in doubt of this argument. They further state that the changes in the law only pressure the suspects and do not apply to witnesses.
Thursday, 5 August 2021
Budget 2021 and its Implications for Migration
Budget 2021 was released on Tuesday night. Amongst some of the headline items are:
- Australia’s “economic engine is roaring back to life”, according to Treasurer Josh Frydenberg;
- economic growth is forecast to reach 4.2% in 2021-2022; and
- unemployment is forecast to be as low as 4.75% in 2022-2023.
This all appears to be good news indeed.
However, many of the media outlets have reported that migration will be a “loser” from the Budget. It is expected that international borders will not reopen until mid-2022. Net overseas migration is expected to be in the negative by 96,600 people in 2020-2021. It has not been in the negative since 1916.
There are clearly some challenges, both for intending migrants as well as for Australia’s skills pool. But there are also some opportunities.
Here are my thoughts:
- With the economy continuing to grow, there will be significant demand across many sectors for skilled workers. Anecdotal evidence from employers suggests that this demand will be difficult to meet. The budgetary measures to level-up the skilling of Australians will take time to bear fruit.
- For employers in critical sectors, there remains the ability to apply for exemptions to the border closures to enable skilled workers to enter Australia. This will need to be looked at on a case-by-case basis.
- Employers may consider tapping into a large pool of skilled international student graduates who are looking to remain in Australia in the long term.
- International borders will remain closed to overseas students, although there is some word of localised travel bubbles being negotiated. In Western Australia, we will likely be the last of the States to negotiate a travel bubble, given our historical conservatism in keeping our borders shut. This means that WA educational institutions will continue to bear the brunt of decreased international student numbers.
- Existing international students may consider visa options available to them to remain in Australia longer. This may include further studies to upskill them into an occupation which may support a more permanent visa outcome.
- Perth remains a privileged city despite its relative isolation and ongoing border closures. It is a “regional area” for migration purposes and supports applications for Subclass 494 Regional Employer Sponsored visas for a significant cohort of skilled workers. International students can also take advantage of Perth’s regional status to renew their Subclass 485 Graduate Visas for an extra 12 months (or an extra 24 months if they live and work outside the metropolitan area).
In recent times, we have also fielded a large number of enquiries for former permanent residents looking to return to Australia on Resident Return Visas. In the midst of the COVID pandemic, Australia’s stability and economic strength are attracting these former residents back. Prospects of recovering residency should be explored.
The Government’s new “bright line” tax residency rule, namely that individuals will be deemed Australian tax residents where they are physically present in Australia for a minimum on 183 days in a year, provides clarity for migrants who may have business interests overseas.
If you are an Australian employer looking to sponsor skilled workers to supplement your workforce, or if you are a temporary visa holder looking for options to stay permanently, please get in touch with us.
To know more, visit https://www.munrodoig.com.au/practice-areas/migration/
All You Need to Know About Land Surveyors
Land surveyors play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of property boundaries, construction projects, and land use planning...
-
Let's look at why timeshare cancellation is a simple way to cancel a timeshare. Leave the heavy lifting to an experienced timeshare atto...
-
What do you do if you’re arrested? Even if you think you haven’t done anything wrong, or that they don’t have enough evidence to charge you,...
-
Unfortunately, personal injury accidents are common occurrences, injuring many people across the United States. Accidents can happen to anyo...